Food, Movement, and Mutual Aid

Opening reflection

This work didn’t begin as a project. It began as movement.

Food needed to get somewhere. Someone had extra. Someone else had none.

A car was used. Time was shared. Conversations followed.

What emerged wasn’t a service — it was a rhythm.

How it unfolded

At first, the focus was practical: getting food from one place to another.

But repetition changes things.

The same streets. The same faces. The same questions asked in passing.

Over time, delivery turned into connection. Connection turned into familiarity. Familiarity made room for mutual care.

People didn’t just receive food — they participated in the process. Suggestions were offered. Needs were named. Small adjustments were made together.

Mutual aid, not charity

This work sits more comfortably under the idea of mutual aid than charity.

There was no central authority deciding what was best. No fixed roles of giver and receiver. No expectation of gratitude.

Instead, there was responsiveness.

Food moved where it was needed. People contributed what they could — time, storage space, local knowledge, encouragement.

The work belonged to the relationships that held it.

What changed

As the rhythm settled, something subtle shifted.

People began checking in on one another. Information was shared.

Trust grew.

The food still mattered — but it was no longer the centre. The centre became connection.

This wasn’t something that could be planned in advance. It only appeared because the project stayed small enough to listen.

Why this remains a small project

There were opportunities to formalise this work. To apply for funding. To define roles. To set targets.

But doing so would have changed the nature of what was happening.

Keeping it small allowed it to remain:

Its strength lay in its ability to respond rather than expand.

What I’ve learned

This project taught me that movement creates opportunity.

When things move — food, people, attention — connection follows.

It also reinforced that care doesn’t always need a name to be legitimate. Sometimes it just needs enough trust to continue.

Where it sits now

The rhythm still exists, though it changes shape.

Some weeks it’s active. Other times it rests.

That’s part of its design.

Small projects need room to breathe. They are sustained not by pressure, but by attentiveness to what’s actually possible.

Closing reflection

Mutual aid doesn’t announce itself. It grows quietly through repetition, presence, and trust.

This project remains small by choice — not because it lacks value, but because this scale is where it does its best work.

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from Christiaan McCann | Risks and Solutions for the Vulnerable | Socialwork Projects in Hobart